Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a thinner and much lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy A50s has a screen that is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3S's screen, because although the Galaxy A50s has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a slightly better memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and the same sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.