Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with an 85.5 score against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A51 design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though they were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy A51 features a screen that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one, because although the Galaxy A51 has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A51 has slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and the same resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.