Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A51 5G is a somewhat lighter and thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G features a display that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same sensor size and a 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video and a lot better video quality.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a greater memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.