Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cyber shade | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 features a display that is very similar to the display in nubia Red Magic 3S, because although the Galaxy A52 has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each inch of display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size. Galaxy A52 captures clearer photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera, faster 30 fps video frame rate and a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.