Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cyber shade | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a screen that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3S one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back, better 30 fps video frame rate and a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bigger storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.