Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a lot better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a general score of 91.1 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer device, and it's also lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S and the Galaxy A52s have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A52s has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count in each inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A52s features a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking images in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures, better 30 frames per second video frame rate and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a greater memory to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.