Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a overall score of 75.8 against 75.8. Nubia Red Magic 3S is a newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A6, but it is extremely thicker and heavier. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a bigger display, a better pixel amount per display inch and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.