Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a score of 76.9 against 75.8. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy A70 body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit worse pixels amount per inch in the display, they both have a same size screen. The Galaxy A70 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger camera sensor.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy A70 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.