Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a 92.9 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a display that's very similar to the display in nubia Red Magic 3S, and although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a just a little better pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400, they both have a screen with the same size. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and higher video frame rate.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a little more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.