Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Galaxy F62 is a newer and a bit thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is just a little heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster). Galaxy F62 features a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy F62 also has a quite better screen pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy F62 has a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 shoots slightly better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and better video frame rates.
Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.