Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. These phones work with the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is a lot thinner but much heavier than nubia Red Magic 3S, and both were released only 1 months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Fold. Both have 12 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor, a camera with way more mega pixels and a lot better video definition.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.