Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a overall score of 78.9 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy M20 is a lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were released only 8 months apart. These devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a quite larger display. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a better performing processing unit than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a way more mega pixels camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy M20 and nubia Red Magic 3S feature really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.