Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. Galaxy M30 is a lighter and thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these phones have the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system).
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Galaxy M30 counts with a little bit more storage for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy M30's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery performance in nubia Red Magic 3S. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality, a bigger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a much better video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.