Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy M51 design is newer, just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M51. They have a better pixels number in each inch in the screen, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a screen of the same size. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery performance than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M51 and nubia Red Magic 3S both have really similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy M51 has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rate, a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a much better 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.