Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. The Galaxy Note 20 design is newer, thinner and a bit lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. Nubia Red Magic 3S and Galaxy Note 20 have extremely similar screens, and although the Galaxy Note 20 has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display, they both have a screen of the same size.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality photos and slower 15 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a larger aperture.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.