Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a processing unit that is very similar to nubia Red Magic 3S's CPU, both have 8 cores and 12 GB of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a little larger display, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a better display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot more MP camera in the back and faster video frame rates.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.