Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a overall score of 80.4 against 75.8. Although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's construction is somewhat thinner and notably lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% more battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger sensor, a camera in the back with way more MP and a much higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition costs a little more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.