Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only 2 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a display that's just as good as nubia Red Magic 3S's screen, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater display density. The Galaxy Note10 counts with as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the nubia Red Magic 3S one, they have the same internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent more battery size. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photographs, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 costs a lot more than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.