Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is an much older phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but Samsung managed to build it thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher video definition, a larger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.