Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with as much memory capacity for apps and games as the nubia Red Magic 3S, they have the same 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better video quality, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S10 5G is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.