Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, although both were released only 4 months apart. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a display that's very similar to nubia Red Magic 3S's display, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit higher pixels count in each inch of screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a screen with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a better storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher video frame rate.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy S10 Lite is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.