Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both were only released with a couple months difference. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e has a little sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos and a way more megapixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10e is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.