Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a score of 90.8 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better screen pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing worse quality photographs, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S20 FE is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.