Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only 5 months difference, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is a little heavier but also a little bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a greater pixels count per inch in the display and a little bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and better 24 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3S one.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.