Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cyber shade | -- |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a score of 89.1, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and much lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features a slightly better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also counts with a bit higher display density. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S21 FE is more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.