Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a general score of 93.4 against 75.8. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S22's body is much newer, way thinner and way lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S22 features an incredibly better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a bit better pixels amount in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a camera in the back with more MP, a way bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and higher 24 fps video frame rates.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has greater battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Galaxy S22 costs more than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.