Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit heavier than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's a little bit thinner and also much newer. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a better pixel count in each display inch.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures in low-light environments, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a way bigger sensor, a much better 108 megapixels resolution back camera and higher video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in nubia Red Magic 3S.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.