Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | -- |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Cyber shade | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. Samsung Galaxy S25's body is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S25 features a better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per inch of screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25, because it has more internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, higher 30 fps video frame rate and a back camera with more mega pixels.
The Galaxy S25 is more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.