Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | -- |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Cyber shade | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a bit larger display, a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. Galaxy S25 Ultra and nubia Red Magic 3S have quite similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both have the same 256 GB internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot higher 200 MP resolution back camera, a way larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and better 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and nubia Red Magic 3S have quite similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.