Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy S5 Sport has an older 4.4.2 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S5 Sport is older than nubia Red Magic 3S, it's design is incredibly lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the display. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a back camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a way larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments, a much better video definition and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.