Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Samsung Galaxy S7's construction is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little better performance than Galaxy S7, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the display. The nubia Red Magic 3S has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a greater camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger back camera sensor and a way better 48 mega pixels resolution camera. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy S7 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.