Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a overall score of 78.1 against 75.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is extremely older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's design is much thinner and much lighter. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has older 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit faster processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a camera with a way better resolution, a lot better video definition and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality. Nubia Red Magic 3S features much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.