Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with an 80.1 score against 75.8. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the older 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is somewhat heavier and much thicker than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a lot larger sensor and a way better 7680x4320 video quality. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.