Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a display that is just as good as the screen in nubia Red Magic 3S, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution, a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.