Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both of them were released only 4 months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit greater display pixel density.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations, a lot better video resolution, a lot bigger sensor and a lot more mega pixels back camera. Nubia Red Magic 3S and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip count with similar memory to install games and applications, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.