Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer phone, and it is also incredibly thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a little bit higher screen pixel density.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger aperture and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is way more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.