Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer phone, and it's also lighter and a lot thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a processor that's just as good as the processor in nubia Red Magic 3S, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G and nubia Red Magic 3S feature incredibly similar storage to install applications and games, they have the same internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% more battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.