Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a score of 90.6 against 75.8. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and extremely thinner phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is also noticeably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both of them have 8 cores and a 12 GB RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture and a way better resolution camera. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the nubia Red Magic 3S, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.