Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia 5 II is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a global score of 87.2 against 75.8. Sony Xperia 5 II's body is newer, noticeably lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Xperia 5 II features a little sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a little bit higher display pixels density.
The Sony Xperia 5 II features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better processing unit than Xperia 5 II, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better pictures and videos than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has better battery duration than Xperia 5 II, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Xperia 5 II is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.