Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZs has an overall score of 77.2, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. The Sony Xperia XZs is an incredibly older phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but Sony was able to make it noticeably lighter and thinner anyway. Sony Xperia XZs has a screen that's very similar to the display in nubia Red Magic 3S, because although the Sony Xperia XZs has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Sony Xperia XZs shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, a much worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much less mega pixels camera and a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low light situations.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much longer battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Xperia XZs, else you can save some dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.