Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 78.8 score against 75.8. Although the Xperia Z4v is older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's design is noticeably lighter and thinner. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better processing power than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, and they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a higher amount of RAM. The Xperia Z4v counts with a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater memory for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Xperia Z4v, because it has a bigger sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and video, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way better video definition.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Sony Xperia Z4v is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.