Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
TCL 20 Pro 5G is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 76.1 score against 75.8. These devices work with Android OS, but TCL 20 Pro 5G has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The TCL 20 Pro 5G is a newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a display of the same size. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same internal storage, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better hardware performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same sensor size and a same resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much better video definition and a bigger aperture.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better battery life than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.