Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2022-03-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.01 x 2.75 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blue, Grey and Purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 50.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 12X is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 77.8 score against 75.8. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Xiaomi 12X has an older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Xiaomi 12X is a extremely newer phone, and it is also thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior processor than Xiaomi 12X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi 12X features a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S and the Xiaomi 12X have really similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi 12X has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, it also counts with a higher resolution back-facing camera and better 24 frames per second video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi 12X, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi 12X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.