Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-02-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.75 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a general score of 84.4, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Xiaomi 14 Ultra is a way newer and just a little bit thinner phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's just a little heavier. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi 14 Ultra has 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a way better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a higher display pixels density. Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with as much storage for apps and games as the nubia Red Magic 3S one, they have the same 256 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better performance than Xiaomi 14 Ultra. They have 8 CPU cores and 12 GB of RAM. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a lot smaller sensor providing a way worse image quality, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra also counts with better 30 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a camera with a better 50 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra and nubia Red Magic 3S have extremely similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.