Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G615-MC6 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Xiaomi 14T design is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi 14T has the previous 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi 14T counts with a way better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi 14T also has a quite higher pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior CPU than Xiaomi 14T. They have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM memory.
Xiaomi 14T and nubia Red Magic 3S feature extremely similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Xiaomi 14T's battery lifetime is very similar to nubia Red Magic 3S's battery duration. The Xiaomi 14T takes clearer pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi 14T also has a back-facing camera with more MP, higher video frame rates and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.