Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a score of 84.5, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Xiaomi 14T Pro design is newer, a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi 14T Pro has older 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better hardware performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi 14T Pro features an incredibly better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi 14T Pro also has a little bit higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and a little higher count of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi 14T Pro also has a camera with more megapixels, a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos, faster video frame rate and a larger aperture.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro features as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the nubia Red Magic 3S one, they have equal internal memory capacity. Xiaomi 14T Pro features a battery duration that's just as good as the battery lifetime in nubia Red Magic 3S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.