Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blasting black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. Both devices in this comparison include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is a little thicker and a little bit heavier than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a bit bigger display, more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with higher video frame rate, a much more mega pixels back camera and a larger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's memory to install applications and games is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3S's one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S and the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro both feature similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.