Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-02-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Horizon blue and Midnight gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a general score of 88.8 against 75.8. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 11 has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Mi 11 is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 11 features a much better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a little bit larger screen, more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 11 captures much better photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 11 also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and higher 30 fps video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.