Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 6 is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 76.5 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Mi 6's body is much thinner and notably lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 6 has just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a much higher video definition, a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3350mAh.
The Xiaomi Mi 6 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.