Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a score of 81.4, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both of these phones include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE construction is notably lighter and extremely thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, although both were released only 6 months apart.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a quite greater count of pixels per display inch.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a 48 MP camera and the same sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger aperture and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.